KING George Tiberius DAVIS
says,
I
will drive this membership down at any cost!
|
|||
THIS IS AN ADAPTATION FROM KING GEORGE TIBERIUS DAVIS
|
|||
“Greetings to my fellow servant followers!” It is I, you democratically self-appointed King here again to point out some more examples of the ineptness of the IBT and its’ lack of fight as UAL drags its feet in these negotiations. What follows are excerpts from the last negotiations update.
We
met with the Company on Wednesday, January 14, 2015, in Dallas, Texas for the
first day of a scheduled two-day session. Upon conclusion of our last session
in December, [Yes
it’s true another 4 week gap between negotiating sessions] the Company advised they would have Article 2 (Scope) proposal
prepared to present at this session, however, due to a personal issue with one
of their Subject Matter Experts (SME) on Article 2 (Scope) related items, we
were informed that they would not be presenting Article 2 (Scope) during this
session.
“What
nerve, is the IBT kidding me? First the Company lawyer in the Resource
Utilization Arbitration and now a Subject Matter Expert, I….. What, oh, this is
not an IBT update? It’s the AMFA - SWA Technician Negotiations Update #28? Well
there must be some explanation, read on.”
At the beginning of our
January 14 session the parties addressed the status of each open article. The
Company was initially confused as to what articles they owed responses to.
After discussion, however, the parties agreed that AMFA had no open articles on
our side that required a counterproposal. The Company, however, owed responses
to articles 9, 11, 13, 20, and 24. Articles 4, 5, 6, 9, and 24 remain open, but
need Maintenance Control and Technical Instructors items resolved with our SMEs
and the appropriate department leaders. Articles 2, 14, 15, 29 and Letter of
Agreements 1 and 2 have yet to be opened.
“Oh my, please bring your King a drink. How can
this be? Confused as to what counters SWA owes AMFA? The Company owes AMFA
counters on 5 Articles they have not even attempted to draft? Oh, the rooms
spinning, AMFA and SWA have been at the table since the summer of 2012. Surely
the almighty AMFA will rectify this blatant slap in the face right here right
now during this week of sessions, please read on.
”The Company then requested a caucus to prepare counteroffers for
articles 13, 20, and possibly articles 9 and 24. After nearly a three and a
half hour wait including lunch, the Company returned with the exact proposals
that they had provided us last year for all four articles with the one caveat
being possibly allowing us to use our vacation in conjunction with the four (4)
days of bereavement leave. They also said they would need their SMEs to address
sections of articles 9 and 24.
Following this utterly
unproductive negotiation session, we advised the Company that we were going to
utilize the remainder of the day and the following day to work as a Committee.
The next session is
scheduled for February 19, 2015, and we will work on Maintenance Control
specific items. We would like to thank those who took their time to observe
these negotiations. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact your
representative. We also appreciate your support.
“Call 911, what, how, I don’t…… NOOOOOO – only
carriers dealing with the IBT act this way, never ever would a Company treat
AMFA like this. Not after nearly three years of negotiating. How can so many
Articles still be open? More Subject Matter Experts?” Another 5 weeks between
sessions?”
“Something must be wrong- surely this is a
Teamster trick.
Check for finger prints on that update immediately! Release the
Hounds! Wait, perhaps I can change all AMFA references to IBT and all SWA
references to UAL” After all:
Your King has titled his
papers “The Truth”. I will not, continue such circulation if I am going to have
the truth tainted by any facts. “This I Promise!”
No comments:
Post a Comment